amazedshop


filter: +dictionary +university +business +matter +interpretation +agency +center +microsoft +courts +human +materials +federal +values +corporations +partnerships +collins +reader +terms +ebook +associations +casebooks +judge +another +through +scalia +justice +concise +prior +edition +common +case +ambiguity +their +potential +casebook
tags: agency ambiguity another associations business case casebook casebooks center collins common concise corporations courts dictionary ebook edition federal human interpretation judge justice materials matter microsoft partnerships potential prior reader scalia terms their through university values
$28.5
law dictionary ebook collins
The portable, constant companion for all law students, and the essential reference for laymen, business people, and all who desire a reliable guide to the laws special terminology. details
$189
business associations cases and
With the prior edition of this concise, up-to-date casebook having been adopted at over 100 law schools, the seventh edition preserves the authors tradition of providing a comprehensive overview of agency, partnership, and corporation law. It also continues to emphasize six basic editorial principles: Be lean but not mean, cases edited ruthlessly to produce a readable and concise result. Facts matter, so they are included in all their potential ambiguity. Bring a planners perspective to the table through extensive use of transactionally-oriented problems. details
$23.95
a matter of interpretation
We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier cases to achieve the desired aim--"distinguishing one prior case on his left, straight-arming another one on his right, high-stepping away from another precedent about to tackle him from the rear, until (bravo!) he reaches the goal--good law." But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers [...]. details